What's all the buzz about Outcomes-based Advertising?

There's a growing trend in the advertising industry that's causing quite a buzz: Outcomes-Based Advertising. As the advertising landscape continues to evolve in response to changing technologies and consumer behavior, marketers are increasingly shifting their focus from traditional media metrics to real business outcomes.

Understanding Outcomes-Based Advertising 

Outcomes-Based Advertising is a model wherein advertisers pay only when a specific action or result is achieved, such as a sale, lead, or click. This strategy aligns the advertiser's cost directly with the results of the campaign. By shifting the payment structure to be directly tied to tangible outcomes, this structure provides a higher level of transparency and accountability in advertising campaigns.

Although elements of this approach have been around for some time (e.g., Cost Per Action models), it has come into maturity with the rise of retail media networks and increased demand for accountability in advertising spend. This enhanced visibility enables advertisers to optimize campaigns using actual sales data, rather than media metrics like clickthrough rate that give only a directional sense of true performance.

The Importance of Outcomes-Based Advertising 

Outcomes-Based Advertising is gaining popularity because it directly addresses a business' ultimate goal: achieving tangible results.

For businesses, the benefits are immense. It reduces wasted ad spend, drives higher return on investment (ROI), and promotes transparency between advertisers and service providers, creating a more reliable and efficient advertising ecosystem.

In some cases, advertisers only pay when the desired outcome is achieved, making it a highly cost-effective approach. This payment structure encourages advertisers to optimize their campaigns to maximize the desired outcomes, leading to more efficient use of their advertising budget.

In addition to driving sales, outcomes-based advertising can also generate other valuable outcomes for advertisers, like helping to build a database of qualified leads, expanding brand reach, or encouraging customer engagement. By focusing on outcomes, advertisers can adapt their strategies to suit different campaign objectives. 

To accomplish this advertisers must have access to accurate and timely data to evaluate the success of their campaigns and optimize accordingly. This necessitates the use of standardized measurement frameworks to ensure consistency across different platforms and publishers.

Standardizing Measurement: The Need for Consistency 

The push for standardizing measurement in outcome-based advertising has gained significant momentum in recent years. 

The need for standardization arises from the fragmented nature of the ad tech industry, where various platforms, publishers, retailers, and advertisers have their own metrics and measurement methodologies. This lack of consistency makes it challenging for advertisers to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of their campaigns across different channels.

To address this issue, industry stakeholders, including advertisers, agencies, and technology providers, have been advocating for a standardized approach to measurement. The goal is to establish a common set of metrics, methodologies, and definitions that can be universally applied across advertising platforms.

The release of the Media Rating Council's (MRC) Outcomes and Data Quality Standards represents the culmination of a long-term industry-wide effort to standardize measures of advertising delivery and its impact on business outcomes.

The standards provide a clear framework against which providers of attribution measurement can be evaluated. The standards cover various outcomes measures like attribution, market mix modeling, and address the quality of data underlying these methods.

The development of these standards was a collaborative effort involving over 100 organizations from across the advertising and media industries, including the Association of National Advertisers (ANA), the 4As, and the Association of Canadian Advertisers (ACA). This level of collaboration ensures that the standards align with the needs of marketers and advertisers, offering a roadmap for measurement requirements.

The standards stipulate that outcomes related to media and advertising activities should be relevant, logical, and aligned with user goals. They should also be supported by consistent definitions and approaches. It also covers aspects of measurement like interactions with ads, methodology disclosure for ROI and ROAS measurement, the handling of datasets, and the importance of cross-media coverage.

The standards give a comprehensive set of guidelines for outcome-based measurement so they can be vetted, encouraging all providers of attribution to seek accreditation. This development is expected to further the use of outcome-based measurement in the industry and encourage innovation. The ultimate goal of these standards is to enable more effective, consistent, and trustworthy measurement of ad performance across the industry, leading to more optimized advertising strategies and spend.

Creating a standard for ad measurement across platforms, publishers, retailers, and advertisers will allow for a more concrete system to build future innovations off of, like training new technology.

Emerging Trends in Outcomes-Based Advertising 

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is already reshaping Outcomes-Based Advertising with algorithms that can optimize processes to:

  • Clean data
  • Predict consumer conversions
  • And forecast market dynamics 

to not only increase efficiency but also improve the effectiveness of campaigns. 

Other trends include increased use of predictive analytics, integration with Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems, and a stronger focus on customer lifetime value in determining desired outcomes.

Common Challenges in Implementing Outcomes-Based Advertising 

The shift to Outcomes-Based Advertising is not without challenges. Businesses often struggle with a:

  • Lack of real-time data - Legacy measurement providers often rely on data aggregation from various third parties, resulting in a months-long delay in reporting. This leads to a lag in optimization, and in turn money wasted
  • Lack of reporting granularity - Many measurement providers can’t track beyond the campaign level, so marketers don’t have insight into what tactics and creatives are actually driving performance.
  • Lack of holistic purchase data - Sales data is widely available for CPG brands, but less so for other industries and verticals, such as QSR, beauty retailers and insurance.

other stories you might like